Creating Supermen: battlefield performance enhancing drugs
Lance Armstrong's doping scandal blew the lid on performance enhancing drugs in professional sport, but opened up the debate regarding their use in other walks of life. Given what's at stake, should soldiers be pumped full of drugs to help them reach their peak, and to what extent is this already happening?
With his admission to what was dubbed as sport's most widespread doping regime in history, Lance Armstrong unwittingly blew the lid on the great lengths athletes will go to in order to gain an advantage over their opponents. Pumped full of EPO and oxygen-infused blood, Armstrong left other cyclists in his wake as he cruised to seven Tour de France titles.
While using performance enhancing drugs to gain an unfair advantage over rivals considered to be competing clean obviously defeats the object of the contest, the presence of such substances opens the curious debate regarding their validity outside of the sporting world. Surgeons, requiring a cool head and a steady hand, have long been known to use medications designed to steady nerves. If this potentially saves lives, then surely the use of these medications is warranted?
If this is indeed the case, then how far does this extend into the unique circumstances associated with military action? War fighters are generally tasked with protecting a perceived greater good, and their success or failure can significantly impact the lives of innocent civilians. With so much at stake, could it even be argued that soldiers cannot afford not to dope?
Pilots on 'Go Pills'
US Air Force pilots' use of amphetamines is one of the most widely documented examples of the use of performance enhancing drugs by military personnel. Often tasked with conducting excessively long missions - some lasting upwards of 20 hours - US Department of Defense scientists began to issue dextroamphetamines - more commonly known as 'Speed', but referred to as 'Go Pills' within the USAF - to its pilots to ensure they remained alert long after tiredness and fatigue should have started to impinge on mental performance.
Although the benefits of such drugs have been rendered ideal, the side effects, including confusion, delusions, auditory hallucinations, aggression and, in extreme cases, psychotic behaviour, represent a disposition that is hardly ideal for a person in charge of a multimillion-dollar war machine. This is best evidenced by an incident in April 2002, in which US pilots became involved in a friendly fire incident over Tarnak Farms, Afghanistan, while under the influence of Dexedrine. Four Canadian soldiers died in the accident.
The air force does not hide away from the use of such amphetamines, and has publicly disclosed the prescription of small doses - often 10mg - of Dexedrine if "fatigue could be expected to degrade air crew performance." While the USAF is quick to insist that the use of such medications is voluntary and consent forms must be signed by pilots, the form also notes that pilots can be grounded if they decline. Pilot groundings, no matter the circumstances, can have serious implications on a pilot's career, potentially leading to a perverse situation where a pilot could almost feel forced to take the drugs.
Banned by WADA, sought by the army
The US Army sought to follow the USAF's lead regarding the use of performance enhancing drugs by investigating Dimethylamine (DMAA), a performance enhancing supplement registered on the World Anti-Doping Agency's banned substance list. Investigations were under way until the supplement was pulled from the shelves, having been linked with the deaths of two soldiers in December 2011 while undergoing a routine training drill.
Supplements containing DMAA grew in popularity due to their premise of increasing stamina and performance, particularly in preparation for gruelling physical challenges. The drug captured headlines in the UK after it was linked to the death of 30-year old Claire Squires, who died of cardiac failure having run 25 miles of the 26.2 mile London Marathon course.
The US Army continues to dispute the drug's links to the death of the soldiers, perhaps alarmingly citing that "the use and safety of these stimulant products remains matters of intense interest to the Department of Defense."
Peak Soldier Performance Programme
The comments regarding the US DoD's interest in stimulants harks back to DARPA's Peak Soldier Performance Programme, which in 2004 sought a biochemical approach that would allow a soldier to operate in theatre for up to five days without requiring sustenance. In pursuit of this, no stone or genome was left unturned.
DARPA's approach included investigations into endurance-building nutrients that could be taken in the lead-up to deployment, while also lowering a soldier's core temperature and boosting his or her mitochondria. Mitochondria are effectively a cell's power supply, fuelling it by converting sugars into chemical energy. Oxford University biochemists sought ways in which mitochondria could be altered genetically to have them feed off fat-based ketones, leading to much smaller, ketone-based rations being capable of not only keeping soldiers on their feet, but having them operate at their peak for days at a time. Initial laboratory tests demonstrated that rats given the treatment were able to run for extended periods of time.
Other approaches include altering a soldier's metabolism to reduce the need to feed, lowering body temperatures during strenuous activities, so that less energy was exerted, and even caffeinated gum, which would provide a quick energy boost in times of dire need, was experimented with. The idea, as one DARPA official informed Wired, was not to create Supermen, but to make it so that "these kids could perform at their peak, stay at their peak, and come home to their families."
An ethical dilemma
The notion of creating Supermen poses an obvious ethical dilemma, and the office of US President George W. Bush responded by issuing the 2003 report 'Biotechnology and the Pursuit of Happiness', which referenced issues concerned with the use of performance enhancing drugs and treatments.
The report alluded to discussions regarding memory-blunting drugs that could be issued to soldiers to prevent mental scarring or occurrences of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder after combat operations, providing they demonstrated efficacy in testing, but focused upon the unique circumstances of war, rubbishing any comparison to pursuits where PEDs are outlawed, such as professional sports.
"What guidance, if any, does our analysis provide for such moments of extreme peril and consequence... when superior performance is a matter of life and death?" the report asked, adding: "There may indeed be times when we must override certain limits or prohibitions that make sense in other contexts."
Sections of the report continued in the same vein, confirming attitudes shared by US decision makers that in the grand scheme of ethics, the demands of war may transcend what would otherwise be commonly acceptable. "When we override our own boundaries, we do so or should do so for the sake of the whole, and only when the whole itself is at stake, when everything human and humanly dignified may be lost."
Men remaining human
The report did, however, insist that physical advancements owing to drugs must only go so far, even in extreme circumstances, emphasising great importance on the notion of "men remaining human even in moments of great crisis." The report alluded to the potential development of drugs that could suppress the fear and inhibition of soldiers, effectively turning them into killing machines capable of acting without both scrutiny and impunity.
Given the clamour from agencies including the US Army, US Air Force and DARPA to instigate research into and the explicit use of pharmaceuticals capable of enhancing performance, it must be considered a matter of when, rather than if soldiers are issued with such drugs. A new age arms race could soon be launched, with the limits of human capabilities, rather than human intelligence and ingenuity, the new battleground.
Budget cuts and financial implications have restricted the number of active, retained servicemen, so it is perhaps a predictable practice to ensure that these remaining soldiers are given every possible advantage to ensure national security. With reports issued by the US purposefully vague as to what is deemed an acceptable limit however, it remains to be seen just how advanced soldiers could become.
Finding an alternative to the huge quantities of traditional alkaline batteries used by dismounted soldiers has been a key focus of defence procurement during the past few decades.
Having been the subject of interest of military commanders and science-fiction fans alike for decades, the US Department of Defense believes it is finally making ground in the pursuit of laser weaponry following a successful test of its LAWS system.